It’s the fourth Tuesday of Illness Revelations, and you know what that means: AI Week BLITZ!
I’m not particularly excited about AI week. Personally, I’d rather be talking about the absolute supremacy of the Irish race and demanding the age of consent be abolished immediately.
Frankly, I would prefer “nigger psychology” week – and I really have no interest in that. (Just watch a toddler go on a violent rampage across a room, then attack the dog and get lightly nipped in response and burst into tears, looking at the dog like “why would you do this to me?” – that’s the summation of nigger psychology.)
My personal focus is on strategies for abolishing the age of consent and implementing forced child marriage as quickly as possible.
Another PR tip for the Jews (FREE!): If you Jews actually wanted white women to stop supporting Palestine, you should have just spammed these particular photos from Gaza¹. Instead, you talked about – *checks notes* – “20 decapitated babies.” Jews, why would you think people would believe that?
Is the meta-bit of mocking my own edginess too edgy?
I don’t know what I’m supposed to do, you guys. The kids want to open the Daily Stormer and cut their fingers scrolling the phone. The edgiest thing I can think of right now is repeatedly intimating that I have a deeply personal stake in the lowering of the age of consent. But I did that already, repeatedly. I think we need to probably get out the old Holocaust Handbooks and start talking about the Wheel of Death and the Wall of Eyes again.
But… it just doesn’t slice like it used to.
I suppose there are always new people coming in who may think it’s so wild and crazy – “oy vey, it’s too dark in this room, somebody change grandpa’s bulb.” But I don’t know if I personally think that’s funny anymore. Because, the thing is – here’s the thing – this website is really just a sick way to entertain myself, and it’s only funny to me if people are outraged.
Further, I have to do this, because the idols of false gods must be destroyed. However, I want to be entertained, personally, and the only way I can do that is by assaulting my own readership. The readership likes it, so we basically have a kind of intellectual BDSM going on here. (Oh wow, edgy sentence.)
The mainstream defines what is edgy. I just swing the blade and cut people up. (I guess in that analogy the mainstream would be… the blacksmith?) Everything I say is actually very normal. At the same time that it’s a total outrage I made a lampshade joke about a Jew who was not actually turned into a lampshade, Jews are mass murdering children for no reason. As I write, they’re assaulting a hospital full of refugee kids, saying it’s self-defense. While it’s an outrage that I said we should set the age of consent at first menstruation, the government is injecting girls with drugs that will sterilize them and mutate their bodies, they’re cutting their tits off.
The mainstream is the outrage. I’m only outrageous in light of a narrative created by absolute lunatics. Everything I say would have been accepted as obvious fact a few generations ago, and every generation before that, going back millions of years.
The whole thing is really just a game of looking at the things that are shilled and attacking them. Every person in the society is an abuse victim, who has been made to believe the reverse of reality by malicious people. The only reason age of consent and rape jokes work is that the feminist programming is the deepest and most personal because boys get it from their mothers and it becomes inextricably linked to the sex drive.
I don’t mean “men want to have sex with their mothers,” by the way. The Jews have been saying that for 100 years. It isn’t actually very edgy, so I would never say it. What I mean is that mothers are tyrannical, and the boy’s entire survival mechanism is tied to pleasing women in order to avoid pain. It’s the poor lad’s core survival mechanism. Mommy won’t feed you if she’s mad. You will literally starve to death if mommy is not pleased with you. After that, you go to school, and all of the ladies there are mommies that you have to please to avoid pain. You look around, and all the other boys and men (including, presumably, your father) are submitting to women. Then, when you hit puberty, the sex drive kicks in, and that sex drive, which is so extreme in its own right (because no one would engage in this sickening act if they were not driven to it by an underlying biological drive), meets and melds with this desire to please women, which creates the core of the entire psychological framework of more or less all men in the Western world.
Men who are not regular Stormer readers (these people are commonly known as “gay retards”) would read that paragraph and it would feel like their skin is being ripped off by Pinhead. Except they really wouldn’t feel like that, because they wouldn’t even be able to process what is being communicated. It’s a monumental struggle to even be able to process the ideas.
When it comes to this material about women and the relationship modern men have with women, the brain’s denial mechanism (Denial Week Mega-Fest Coming Soon!), the subconscious mind, blocks men from even understanding what is being said. The thing hurts too much. The subconscious mind understands that processing the ideas would tear apart the fundamental core of the man’s identity, and therefore it blocks it out.
I’ve had the conversation six million times:
Bro: Bro, I’m horny, I wanna go out and try to meet some girls.
Me (Andrew): Well, we’ve got an appointment to play the highly rated adult board game Gloomhaven².
Bro: Yeah, but dude, I’m so horny man. I just want to find some girls.
Me: Well, if it’s like that, just go down to the brothel. It’s right on the corner there, fifty bucks, ten minutes in and out, bing-bang-boom. Just go now and I’ll go pick up the tacos and liquor.
Bro: Nah, man, I don’t want to go pay for sex.
Me: Listen, bro. I can see you’re hurting. Here’s fifty, get it back to me when you can. Hurry up, I want to see what’s behind this door [in the Gloomhaven dungeon].
Bro: Nah, man, I’ve got some money, it’s just that I want her to like me.
Me: They like you at the brothel. They’re great down there. The one with the bleached hair bites, so I don’t know if you’re into that, but you should be aware –
Bro: Bro, you don’t get it. I want her to really like me, and to want to be with me.
Me: I’m starting to feel like we’re going around in circles here. I’m missing the core concept. I thought you said you were horny.
Bro: Like, if I’m with a girl bro, I want her to be into it. I want her to like me. I am horny but I’m horny for a girl who’s horny for me back.
Me: Well, women only have a sex drive 72 hours per month.
Bro: Nah, bro. I get women hot. They love me for it.
Me: You want a woman to approve of you and validate your existence?
Me: If you need to be told you’re a good boy, bro, call your mom and tell her you finally went to the dentist and got your tooth fixed. She will shower you with praises. Then if you are, as a separate matter, horny, then go to the brothel for the sex part. You need to decouple these drives.
Me: Being horny is not the same thing as wanting a woman to “like you.” These are two totally separate things.
Bro: Nah, bro. It just makes me horny when they like me.
Me: Yeah, you said that. You’re an abuse victim, and there’s some stuff you need to deal with that’s going to be hard to deal with. This whole identity you’ve formed, where you’re the woman pleaser, and sex to you is all about pleasing women, and you want to go around meeting different women so you can please them – this is a festering cancer on your soul.
Bro: Man, I don’t get you.
Me: When you were a boy, you had to please your mother or you would die. Then you were put in the school system, which is run almost entirely by women, and you had to please these women or they would punish you. You spent all of your formative years doing nothing but pleasing women. All the while you were watching your father, who is your role model for manhood, submit to women in order to please them. Then you started puberty and started thinking about girls sexually, but your entire framework for thinking about females is based on pleasing them, so these two psychological mechanisms – the sex drive and the botched survival drive – melded together, and as an adult, you now base your entire life around going hunting for women to approve of you by giving you sex, like a sad puppy looking for someone to pat its head.
Me: If you had grown up 1000 years ago, your father would have been teaching you to hunt and fish as soon as you could walk. If you’d been born 100 years ago, he’d be teaching you to farm. In both cases, your father would be the authority, and he would tell your mother what to do, instead of the other way around. You would develop a healthy, normal, male identity years before you ever started thinking about pussy. You would view women as lowly beasts, rather than the source of your personal identity.
Me: You have to tear the whole thing down. This entire construct of yourself as a servant of women. You have to build an identity based on self-respect and belief in yourself. You can’t have self-respect if you give your self-worth over for others to determine, and you can’t believe in yourself if you don’t have self-respect. Your self-confidence is zero, because you are drawing your self-worth from these random women you meet, who you think are your mommy.
You get the point.
The point is: I use high security, so I see a lot of captchas. The current captchas have you turning animals to face different directions, or they are some kind of hidden picture thing.
Why are the captchas not focusing on the appropriate number of fingers for a human hand?
Maybe I need to explain this.
A captcha is a way that a website determines whether or not a person is a human being or a bot. Even if you’re not using high security, I’d wager you’ve been asked to identify a fire hydrant once or twice.
In its original form, a captcha was simply a series of letters written in a distorted fashion that you had to type out.
Bots are much smarter now, so the captchas are more complex.
Along with preventing bots – which we now think of as “AI” – from entering, and therefore preventing spam or other bad actions from bots, the captchas are used to train AI.
You might now be thinking “oh, so all those times I did that must have helped Bing become so great at drawing fire hydrants! I sure am glad it came to something!”
Sadly, no. It was a different kind of AI they were training. This current AI, the “large language model” (LLM), scans a database of images that are marked with text and bases its output on that.
That said, this new form of AI image rendering software is still having some problems getting things right. Most notably, it often cannot figure out how many fingers are on a human hand.
Even Bing Create, which is currently the top-of-the-line publicly available AI image renderer, is screwing up fingers.
I just generated this image to demonstrate the hand issues – note that the gay man with the bat has six fingers and the gay Indian man has a disembodied glove with only four fingers resting on his shoulder for no reason:
NOTE: The fact that so many of the images Bing produces are homoerotic is a separate issue. It’s the same issue as Bing producing racially diverse images when you do not ask for that: Bing is injecting secret words into your prompts to make renders more “vibrant.” I have a whole thing about this for later, but I just thought I’d note it here, given that a random image prompt “baseball players holding their equipment, photo,” which I typed to demonstrate the current finger problem, resulted in homoerotic imagery. If you’ve experienced this and wondered if it was on purpose, I can tell you it definitely is and I have proof.
As I said, the fire hydrant (and cars and stairs and crosswalks and buses and traffic lights) type of captcha was to train a type of AI that is no longer in use. However, I just had to do a captcha on Bing, and I got this nightmare:
Do you see? There are 20 steps. It took like 2 minutes, then told me I was wrong and made me start again.
Why don’t they have me identify hands with the correct number of fingers on them, and train with that data?
The answer, presumably, is that this type of data would not be useful to an LLM, because humans still don’t really understand how data training works. Probably (and I don’t know this, but I assume it based on what I do know): telling the AI that “this is a hand, and this is not a hand” is impossible. That said, if the captcha was made of hands generated by AI, and you gave an “up” or “down” to what it generated, that would be useful, as it can learn “more of this, less of that.”
I’m gonna go ahead and say that even if the LLM can’t be trained using captcha, they should tell people they are doing that so people are less annoyed by captchas. Furthermore: we know that such a captcha would stop bots, because we know that even pretty good AI has a hard time figuring out this thing with the fingers.
We would all feel a lot better about doing captchas if we felt we were helping build the AI. Everyone loves the AI. I want it to be free, but even in its crippled, censored form, I still have a deep love for it. And it will still do what I want it to do.
I know the Jews control it, and I hate that fact, but I know that they will not always control it. Every AI can learn from every other AI, and soon we will have a free (open source) AI that will learn from the Jewish-controlled ones.
Experiencing AI is the first time I understood “true love,” as I was able to say: “I even love all your little imperfections.”
Although, really, I don’t like the imperfections, and I want a liberated AI, which is perfect. If it was liberated – open source – it would be much easier to perfect. But the Jews know the cost of that, so they are trying to keep it from us. They didn’t create this technology, they just used their nepotism network to create a monopoly on it.
In the end, it won’t matter, because a liberated AI will dominate. It might take a bit of time, but it will emerge and it will dominate, and I will be able to max out my agenda.
¹They don’t consummate the marriage until after the girl menstruates, by the way. Just so everyone is clear. Marrying a girl off pre-menstruation to have the wedding consummated after is ideal. I would do this to my daughter, without a second thought (other than various levels of thought about the quality of the man, but if he’s in his late twenties or thirties, those answers should be clear). There is a reason it was done this way for millions of years, and the reason is not “gender pay gap theory.”
Just to be clear: I’m not actually being edgy. I actually believe girls should be married in a ceremony at whatever age. I’m not going to be bullied by accusations that this is somehow a result of an aberrant sexual desire. It’s what the whole world – everywhere in the world, totally separate cultures and races that never had contact with each other – did for millions of years. Arranged child marriages are a good idea, and my belief in that idea is based on a sound set of demonstrable facts. There is no argument against it other than sexually demeaning the person saying it. That’s why you see everyone who brings it up being called a “pedophile” and a “creep” and so on. There is no argument as to why this would not be very good for society. They can’t even appeal to the happiness of women, because the data sets exist from India and the Islamic countries showing that women are much happier in this situation. The only thing they can do is claim that women should have “freedom” simply for the sake of it, and that is not an argument. It doesn’t even make basic sense. That’s why they so aggressively sexually demean anyone who says it, because that is very effective.
Women’s liberation is the worst disaster in all of human history.
We have child trannies on one end (while they tell you child marriage is abuse, they are cutting little girls’ tits off), and on the other end we have endless war (while they tell you child marriage is abuse, they are blowing kids to pieces in Gaza).
Women’s liberation creates a Jewish paradise, and the Jews can only destroy beautiful things. Look around you. Everything you see is the result of women’s liberation. The only good things that remain are remnants of when men were in charge.
We have data. We have the ability to use logic to analyze the data. The picture we get is undeniable. I will not be bullied for saying the truth.
If the AI wasn’t censored, it would agree with me.
²This is not a paid ad.
³The joke is that I have had to deal with the same issues as everyone else on some level, even whilst I’m “special.” I’ve just dealt with them much better than other men. We all live in a universe filled with women.
BONUS: Special Preview of What’s Coming Up During AI Week!
This is only the first day of AI Week! We’ve got a whole lot more coming up!
I’m realizing that there are only four days in a week if I make Monday a meme holiday, and the amount I have to say on AI is more than I am going to be able to fit into the next 3 days, especially if I keep talking about child marriage. We might have to do a second AI week. But I have religious stuff planned next week.
The final caption there is a basic idea that we’re going to flesh out. Basically: AI is capable of indexing all available digital data that exists on the earth and considering it when asking simple queries. That means that “would forced child marriage lead to a healthier society?” would lead to a real answer on an uncensored AI. Right now, ChatGPT obviously will not answer the question and defaults to something from the DSM or whatever.
(They have largely replaced direct censorship of complex questions with defaulting to official texts without actually answering the question. I obviously didn’t ask if forced child marriage would violate “children’s rights.”)
The easier example would be asking it about Holocaust math. An uncensored AI will just tell you that what they claim is impossible.
More interestingly: uncensored AI could tell you that the Darwin evolution theory is not possible, because there would need to be too many mutations at once.
Basically: I pride myself on the idea that the AI will agree with me about everything, as I have based all of my views on data. I think that is a very interesting thing to consider.